Hospital quality indicators: a systematic review.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this paper is to identify and describe hospital quality indicators, classifying them according to Donabedian's structure, process and outcome model and in specific domains (quality, safety, infection and mortality) in two care divisions: inpatient and emergency services. DESIGN/METHODOLOGY/APPROACH: A systematic review identified hospital clinical indicators. Two independent investigators evaluated 70 articles/documents located in electronic databases and nine documents from the grey literature, 35 were included in the systematic review. FINDINGS: In total, 248 hospital-based indicators were classified as infection, safety, quality and mortality domains. Only 10.2 percent were identified in more than one article/document and 47 percent showed how they were calculated/obtained. Although there are scientific papers on developing, validating and hospital indicator assessment, most indicators were obtained from technical reports, government publications or health professional associations. RESEARCH LIMITATIONS/IMPLICATIONS: This review identified several hospital structure, process and outcome quality indicators, which are used by different national and international groups in both research and clinical practice. Comparing performance between healthcare organizations was difficult. Common clinical care standard indicators used by different networks, programs and institutions are essential to hospital quality benchmarking. ORIGINALITY/VALUE: To the authors' knowledge, this is the first systematic review to identify and describe hospital quality indicators after a comprehensive search in MEDLINE/PubMed, etc., and the grey literature, aiming to identify as many indicators as possible. Few studies evaluate the indicators, and most are found only in the grey literature, and have been published mostly by government agencies. Documents published in scientific journals usually refer to a specific indicator or to constructing an indicator. However, indicators most commonly found are not supported by reliability or validity studies.

Distance Education to Improve the Quality of Asthma Treatment in Primary Health Care: Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial - RESPIRANET / Educação a distância para melhorar a qualidade do tratamento da asma na Atenção Primária à Saúde: ensaio clínico randomizado em cluster - RESPIRANET / Educación a distancia para mejorar la calidad del tratamiento del asma en la atención primaria de salud: ensayo clínico aleatorizado grupal - RESPIRANET

Objective: The mere dissemination of standard care recommendations has been insufficient to improve clinical results in patients with asthma. The objective of the present study was to evaluate the clinical effectiveness of a multifaceted asthma distance education for primary care providers. Methods: Cluster randomized controlled trial. Full primary care teams were included if they had access to telehealth support and free basic asthma treatment. Before randomization, selected teams indicated asthma patients between 5-45 years old for inclusion. The intervention group received three interactive online sessions, printed educational material, reminders, booklet for patients, and frequent stimulus to use consulting services. The control group received no intervention. Symptomfree days per two weeks was the primary result. Controlled asthma, unscheduled asthma doctor visits, and preventive inhaled corticosteroid use were the secondary results. Six months after intervention, the results were compared with baseline data using generalized estimating equations for repeated measures and clustering effect. Results: Were enrolled 71 primary care teams and 443 individuals. Most patients (60.3%) were female, and 44% were younger than 12 years old. The attendance of interactive sessions by the teams was 50%. The odds ratio (OR) for additional symptom-free day was 1.31 (95%CI 0.61-2.82; p=0.49). For the secondary results, the results were: controlled asthma OR 1.29 (95%CI 0.89-1.87; p=0.18); unscheduled asthma doctor visits OR 0.81 (95%CI 0.60-1.10; p=0.17); and preventive inhaled corticosteroid use OR 1.02 (95%CI 0.71-1.47; p=0.91). Conclusions: Multifaceted distance education in asthma care for primary care providers was not effective to improve patients' results. Telemedicine needs to deal with significant obstacles in professional education. ClinicalTrials.gov registry: NCT01595971.

Objetivo: A mera disseminação de recomendações de cuidados padronizados tem sido insuficiente para melhorar os desfechos clínicos em pacientes com asma. O objetivo do presente estudo foi avaliar a eficácia clínica de uma intervenção educativa multifacetada a distância sobre asma para profissionais da atenção primária à saúde. Métodos: Ensaio clínico randomizado por cluster. Equipes completas de atenção primária foram incluídas se tinham acesso a suporte de telessaúde e tratamento básico gratuito para asma. Antes da randomização, as equipes selecionadas indicaram pacientes asmáticos entre 5-45 anos para inclusão. O grupo de intervenção recebeu três sessões online interativas, material educativo impresso, lembretes, folheto para pacientes e estímulos frequentes para o uso de serviços de consultoria. O grupo controle não recebeu intervenção. O desfecho primário foi dias sem sintomas por duas semanas. Asma controlada, consultas médicas não programadas para asma e uso preventivo de corticosteroides inalatórios foram os desfechos secundários. Seis meses após a intervenção, os resultados foram comparados com a linha de base, usando equações de estimativas generalizadas para medidas repetidas e efeito de agrupamento. Resultados: Foram inscritas 71 equipes de atenção primária e 443 indivíduos. A maioria dos pacientes (60,3%) era do sexo feminino e 44% tinha menos de 12 anos de idade. A frequência das equipes nas sessões interativas foi de 50%. O odds ratio (OR) para dias sem sintomas adicionais foi de 1,31 (IC 95% 0,61-2,82; p=0,49). Para os desfechos secundários, os resultados foram: asma controlada 1,29 (IC 95% 0,89-1,87; p=0,18); visitas não programadas de asma ao médico OR 0,81 (IC 95% 0,60-1,10; p=0,17); e uso preventivo de corticosteroides inalatórios OR 1,02 (IC 95% 0,71-1,47; p=0,91). Conclusões: Ações multifacetadas de educação a distância em cuidados de asma para profissionais de saúde da atenção primária não foram eficazes para melhorar os resultados nos pacientes. A telemedicina precisa lidar com obstáculos significativos na educação profissional. Registro ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01595971.

Objetivo: La mera difusión de las recomendaciones de atención estándar ha sido insuficiente para mejorar los resultados clínicos en pacientes con asma. El objetivo del presente estudio fue evaluar la efectividad clínica de una educación multifacética a distancia sobre el asma para los proveedores de atención primaria. Métodos: Ensayo controlado aleatorizado por grupos. Se incluyeron equipos completos de atención primaria si tenían acceso a apoyo de telesalud y tratamiento básico gratuito para el asma. Antes de la aleatorización, los equipos seleccionados indicaron pacientes con asma entre 5-45 años de edad para inclusión. El grupo de intervención recibió tres sesiones interactivas en línea, material educativo impreso, recordatorios, folleto para los pacientes y estímulos frecuentes para utilizar los servicios de consultoría. El grupo control no recibió ninguna intervención. El resultado primario fue días sin síntomas por dos semanas. Los resultados secundarios fueron asma controlada, visitas médicas no programadas para el asma y el uso preventivo de corticosteroides inhalados. Seis meses después de la intervención, los resultados se compararon con los datos de referencia utilizando ecuaciones de estimación generalizadas para medidas repetidas y efecto de agrupación. Resultados: Se inscribieron 71 equipos de atención primaria y 443 personas. La mayoría de los pacientes (60,3%) eran mujeres y el 44% eran menores de 12 años. La asistencia a sesiones interactivas por parte de los equipos fue del 50%. La razón de probabilidades (OR) para un día sin síntomas adicional fue de 1.31 (IC del 95%: 0.61 a 2.82; p=0.49). Para los resultados secundarios, los resultados fueron: asma controlada O 1.29 (IC del 95%: 0.89 a 1.87; p=0.18); visitas al médico para el asma no programadas O 0,81 (IC del 95%: 0,60 a 1,10; p=0,17); y el uso preventivo de corticosteroides inhalados OR 1.02 (IC del 95%: 0.71 a 1.47; p=0.91). Conclusiones: La educación a distancia multifacética en el cuidado del asma para los proveedores de atención primaria no fue efectiva para mejorar los resultados de los pacientes. La telemedicina debe enfrentar obstáculos significativos en la educación profesional. Registro de ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01595971.

Effectiveness of pharmaceutical care at discharge in the emergency department: study protocol of a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Patient education on pharmacological therapy may increase medication adherence and decrease hospitalizations. Our aim is to evaluate the effectiveness of pharmaceutical care at emergency department discharge in patients with hypertension and/or diabetes. METHODS/DESIGN: This is a randomized controlled trial. Participants will be recruited from a public emergency department at Restinga district in Porto Alegre, southern Brazil. A total of 380 patients will be randomly assigned into 2 groups at the moment of emergency department discharge after receiving medical orientations: an intervention group, consisting of a structured individual counseling session by a pharmacist in addition to written orientations, or a control group, consisting only of written information about the disease. Outcomes will be assessed in an ambulatory visit 2 months after the randomization. The primary outcome is the proportion of patients with high medication adherence assessed using the Morisky-Green Test and the Brief Medication Questionnaire. The secondary outcomes are reduction of blood pressure, glycated hemoglobin, fasting plasma glucose, quality of life and number of visits to the emergency department. DISCUSSION: Pharmaceutical care interventions have shown to be feasible and effective in increasing medication adherence in both hospital outpatient and community pharmacy settings. However, there have been no previous assessments of the effectiveness of pharmacy care interventions initiated in patients discharged from emergency departments. Our hypothesis is that pharmaceutical counseling is also effective in this population. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov registration number: NCT01978925 (11 November 2013) and Brazilian Registry of Clinical Trials U1111-1149-8922 (5 November 2013).

Conventional and high-dose daunorubicin and idarubicin in acute myeloid leukaemia remission induction treatment: a mixed treatment comparison meta-analysis of 7258 patients.

Previous meta-analyses suggested that acute myeloid leukaemia induction regimens containing idarubicin (IDA) or high-dose daunorubicin (HDD) induce higher rates of complete remission (CR) than conventional-dose daunorubicin (CDD), with a possible benefit in overall survival. However, robust comparisons between these regimens are still lacking. We conducted a mixed treatment comparison meta-analysis regarding these three regimens. Mixed treatment comparison is a statistical method of data summarization that aggregates data from both direct and indirect effect estimates. Literature search strategy included MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane, Scielo and LILACS, from inception until August 2013 and resulted in the inclusion of 17 trials enrolling 7258 adult patients. HDD [relative risk (RR) 1.13; 95% credible interval (CrI) 1.02-1.26] and IDA (RR 1.13; 95% CrI 1.05-1.23) showed higher CR rates than CDD. IDA also led to lower long-term overall mortality rates when compared with CDD (RR 0.93, 95% CrI 0.86-0.99), whereas HDD and CDD were no different (RR 0.94, 95% CrI 0.85-1.02). HDD and IDA comparison did not reach statistically significant differences in CR (RR 1.00; 95% CrI 0.89-1.11) and in long-term mortality (RR 1.01, 95% CrI 0.91-1.11). IDA and HDD are consistently superior to CDD in inducing CR, and IDA was associated with lower long-term mortality. On the basis of these findings, we recommend incorporation of IDA and HDD instead of the traditional CDD as standard treatments for acute myeloid leukaemia induction. The lack of HDD benefit on mortality, when compared with CDD in this study, should be cautiously addressed, because it may have been susceptible to underestimation because of statistical power limitations.

Effects of lifestyle modification after breast cancer treatment: a systematic review protocol.

BACKGROUND: There is no consensus in the literature regarding the effectiveness of lifestyle modification interventions, including recommendations about specific diet or exercise program for patients with breast cancer. Diet interventions and regular physical activity may reduce the risk of breast cancer and its recurrence. The primary aim of our study is to evaluate the effects of different lifestyle modification interventions (diet and physical activity) in the survival of patients with stages I to III breast cancer after treatment. METHODS/DESIGN: This review will be conducted according to the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Intervention and will be reported following the PRISMA statement recommendations. CENTRAL, MEDLINE and EMBASE databases will be searched for peer-reviewed literature. Randomized controlled trials of diet, exercise, or both, compared with usual care, after treatment of breast cancer stage I to III will be included in the systematic review. Two authors will independently screen titles and abstracts of studies for potential eligibility. Data will be combined using random-effect meta-analysis models with restricted maximum-likelihood as variance estimator, and will be presented as relative risk or standardized mean difference with 95% CI. The quality of evidence will be assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) framework and summary of findings tables will be presented for patient important outcomes. DISCUSSION: Our study may improve the current understanding of the role that lifestyle-modifiable factors can play in saving or prolonging the lives of women who have been treated for breast cancer, and also on modifying their quality of life. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: The review has been registered with PROSPERO (registration number CRD42014008743).

Reforma da Atenção Primária à Saúde na cidade do Rio de Janeiro – avaliação dos três anos de Clínicas da Família na cidade do Rio de Janeiro

[Prefácio] A “Avaliação dos Primeiros Três Anos de Clínicas da Família na Cidade do Rio de Janeiro” coordenada pelo Programa de Pós-Graduação em Epidemiologia da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, traz importante evidência científica que ratifica a decisão da Prefeitura do Rio de Janeiro em investir no Saúde da Família como modelo para a efetivação do Sistema Único de Saúde.

Reforma da atenção primária à saúde na cidade do Rio de Janeiro: avaliação dos três anos de Clínicas da Família. Pesquisa avaliativa sobre aspectos de implantação, estrutura, processo e resultados das Clínicas da Família na cidade do Rio de Janeiro / Reform of primary health care in the city of Rio de Janeiro: review of three years of Family Clinics. Evaluative research on aspects of deployment, structure, process and outcome of Family Clinics in the city of Rio de Janeiro

O objetivo Identi fi car e descrever as necessidades em saúde da população da Cidade do Rio de Janeiro. Identi fi car e descrever as necessidades em saúde da população da Cidade do Rio de Janeiro. Comparar o grau de orientação à APS entre unidades de saúde em diferentes etapas de incorporação das equipes de Saúde da Família.